[stringtemplate-interest] separator: a fix or breaking backward compatibility?

[Terence Parr]

On Jul 2, 2009, at 11:52 AM, Monty Zukowski wrote:

> I vote to fix it. It won't break any of my templates and I think
> you've nailed down the behavior I would have expected anyways.

Yeah, this is really annoying because there's no way to get around.  
The new version will handle empty and missing properly. I will be  
making a Empty object.

Ter