[stringtemplate-interest] package name

[Robert Byrne]

I have to agree, the easy readability of StringTemplate wins over the
shorter ST for me.

2009/10/17 Zenaan Harkness <zen at freedbms.net>

> On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 12:14:33AM -0700, Jonathan Buhacoff wrote:
> > Can we please keep complete class names?  I agree with Sam Harwell,
> > who wrote in a different thread, that StringTemplate or Template is
> > clearer than ST.
>
> I have to Ack this one!
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/351422/
> Just read last month, when Ken Thomson was asked what he'd do
> differently about Unix IO api, he would have spelt creat as "create".
>
> zen
>
>
> > On Oct 9, 2009, at 1:10 PM, Terence Parr wrote:
> > > On Oct 8, 2009, at 7:08 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 04:33:36PM -0700, Terence Parr wrote:
> > >>> should i reuse org.stringtemplate or should package be
> > >>> org.stringtemplate.v4 or something?  The classes are differently
> > >>> named
> > >>> so org.stringtemplate.ST and such might be ok.
> > >>
> > >> Are there any classes or packages that would overlap?
> > >
> > > Don't think so...ha! I just realized that the old package was:
> > >
> > > package org.antlr.stringtemplate;
> > >
> > > so
> > >
> > > package org.stringtemplate;
> > >
> > > it is then! no collision.
> > >
> > > Ter
>
> --
> Homepage: www.SoulSound.net -- Free Australia: www.UPMART.org
> Please respect the confidentiality of this email as sensibly warranted.
> _______________________________________________
> stringtemplate-interest mailing list
> stringtemplate-interest at antlr.org
> http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/stringtemplate-interest
>



-- 
Regards,

Robert Byrne,
CTO, Iceberg

www.geticeberg.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.antlr.org/pipermail/stringtemplate-interest/attachments/20091017/4c92a630/attachment.html